team:gdeliege:composite
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| team:gdeliege:composite [2015/08/13 19:25] – geoffrey | team:gdeliege:composite [2016/03/30 15:23] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| can be linked to physical quantities. | can be linked to physical quantities. | ||
| Therefore, these parameters can be identified with suitable experimental tests. For example, the hardening and damage parameters characterizing the shear behaviour are determined by cyclic loading tests on a [(+45∘/−45∘)n]S laminate (Fig. 1). | Therefore, these parameters can be identified with suitable experimental tests. For example, the hardening and damage parameters characterizing the shear behaviour are determined by cyclic loading tests on a [(+45∘/−45∘)n]S laminate (Fig. 1). | ||
| + | |||
| + | Complex as they are, these models neglect important phenomena like the viscoplastic behaviour of the resin or the specific damage mechanism under compressive loading. I am currently working on compressive damage of woven fibre laminates. My goal is to introduce in the mesoscopic model a damage evolution law accounting for the microscopic instabilites (microbuckling) generated in a ply under compression. | ||
| {{ : | {{ : | ||
team/gdeliege/composite.1439486701.txt.gz · Last modified: 2016/03/30 15:22 (external edit)