team:gdeliege:composite
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
team:gdeliege:composite [2015/08/13 17:12] – geoffrey | team:gdeliege:composite [2016/03/30 15:23] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===== Composite materials ===== | ===== Composite materials ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Background === | ||
Carbon-Fibre-Reinforced Polymers (CFRP) are now widely used in aerospace industry | Carbon-Fibre-Reinforced Polymers (CFRP) are now widely used in aerospace industry | ||
Line 8: | Line 10: | ||
(fibre brittle failure, fibre-matrix debonding, matrix ductile failure and delamination) | (fibre brittle failure, fibre-matrix debonding, matrix ductile failure and delamination) | ||
that are not easily described at a macroscopic level. | that are not easily described at a macroscopic level. | ||
+ | When I joined the MN2L-group, my first objective was to implement a material model for composite laminates with woven fibre reinforcement in Metafor. This was part of a project in collaboration with Sonaca, LMS-Samtech and the Université Catholique de Louvain, among others. | ||
- | My objective was to implement a material model for composite plies with woven fibre | + | === Constitutive laws === |
- | reinforcement in Metafor. | + | |
- | This model is inspired by the meso-model | + | This model I implemented |
proposed by P. Ladevèze and O. Allix [1-2] for unidirectional | proposed by P. Ladevèze and O. Allix [1-2] for unidirectional | ||
composites as well as the 2D model for woven composites proposed by C. Hochard [3]. | composites as well as the 2D model for woven composites proposed by C. Hochard [3]. | ||
- | |||
The idea is to describe the laminate as a stack of 3D orthotropic plies separated by 2D interfaces. | The idea is to describe the laminate as a stack of 3D orthotropic plies separated by 2D interfaces. | ||
- | In a direction | + | In directions |
the plies are elastic and subject to brittle fracture; | the plies are elastic and subject to brittle fracture; | ||
- | in shear, an elastoplastic behaviour | + | in shear, an elastoplastic behaviour |
The 2D interfaces between the plies are elastic with progressive damage. | The 2D interfaces between the plies are elastic with progressive damage. | ||
Practical information on the | Practical information on the | ||
Line 28: | Line 30: | ||
One interesting feature of Ladevèze and Allix' | One interesting feature of Ladevèze and Allix' | ||
can be linked to physical quantities. | can be linked to physical quantities. | ||
- | Therefore, these parameters can be identified with suitable experimental tests. | + | Therefore, these parameters can be identified with suitable experimental tests. For example, the hardening and damage parameters characterizing the shear behaviour are determined by cyclic loading tests on a [(+45∘/−45∘)n]S laminate (Fig. 1). |
+ | |||
+ | Complex as they are, these models neglect important phenomena like the viscoplastic behaviour of the resin or the specific damage mechanism under compressive loading. I am currently working on compressive damage of woven fibre laminates. My goal is to introduce in the mesoscopic model a damage evolution law accounting for the microscopic instabilites (microbuckling) generated in a ply under compression. | ||
{{ : | {{ : | ||
Line 40: | Line 44: | ||
{{ : | {{ : | ||
- | //Figure 4. Impact simulation : (left) experimental setup for impact testing at [[http:// | + | //Figure 4. Impact simulation : (left) experimental setup for impact testing at [[http:// |
{{ : | {{ : |
team/gdeliege/composite.1439478744.txt.gz · Last modified: 2016/03/30 15:22 (external edit)