team:gdeliege:composite
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| team:gdeliege:composite [2015/08/12 08:30] – created geoffrey | team:gdeliege:composite [2016/03/30 15:23] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ==== Composite materials ==== | + | ===== Composite materials ===== |
| + | |||
| + | === Background | ||
| Carbon-Fibre-Reinforced Polymers (CFRP) are now widely used in aerospace industry | Carbon-Fibre-Reinforced Polymers (CFRP) are now widely used in aerospace industry | ||
| Line 8: | Line 10: | ||
| (fibre brittle failure, fibre-matrix debonding, matrix ductile failure and delamination) | (fibre brittle failure, fibre-matrix debonding, matrix ductile failure and delamination) | ||
| that are not easily described at a macroscopic level. | that are not easily described at a macroscopic level. | ||
| + | When I joined the MN2L-group, my first objective was to implement a material model for composite laminates with woven fibre reinforcement in Metafor. This was part of a project in collaboration with Sonaca, LMS-Samtech and the Université Catholique de Louvain, among others. | ||
| - | My objective was to implement a material model for composite plies with woven fibre | + | === Constitutive laws === |
| - | reinforcement in Metafor. | + | |
| - | This model is inspired by the meso-model | + | This model I implemented |
| proposed by P. Ladevèze and O. Allix [1-2] for unidirectional | proposed by P. Ladevèze and O. Allix [1-2] for unidirectional | ||
| composites as well as the 2D model for woven composites proposed by C. Hochard [3]. | composites as well as the 2D model for woven composites proposed by C. Hochard [3]. | ||
| - | |||
| The idea is to describe the laminate as a stack of 3D orthotropic plies separated by 2D interfaces. | The idea is to describe the laminate as a stack of 3D orthotropic plies separated by 2D interfaces. | ||
| - | In a direction | + | In directions |
| the plies are elastic and subject to brittle fracture; | the plies are elastic and subject to brittle fracture; | ||
| - | in shear, an elastoplastic behaviour | + | in shear, an elastoplastic behaviour |
| The 2D interfaces between the plies are elastic with progressive damage. | The 2D interfaces between the plies are elastic with progressive damage. | ||
| Practical information on the | Practical information on the | ||
| Line 28: | Line 30: | ||
| One interesting feature of Ladevèze and Allix' | One interesting feature of Ladevèze and Allix' | ||
| can be linked to physical quantities. | can be linked to physical quantities. | ||
| - | Therefore, these parameters can be identified with suitable experimental tests. | + | Therefore, these parameters can be identified with suitable experimental tests. For example, the hardening and damage parameters characterizing the shear behaviour are determined by cyclic loading tests on a $[(+45^\circ/ |
| - | {{ : | + | Complex as they are, these models neglect important phenomena like the viscoplastic behaviour of the resin or the specific damage mechanism under compressive loading. I am currently working on compressive damage |
| - | == References == | + | {{ : |
| + | //Figure 1. Cyclic loading of a laminate sample with ply orientation $[(+45^\circ/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | //Figure 2. Finite element simulation (Metafor) of an impacted stiffener made of woven carbon fibre laminate// | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | //Figure 3. Finite element simulation (Metafor) of an End-Notched Flexure (ENF) test. It consists in a 3-point bending of a sample with an artificial mid-plane delamination. ENF tests are used to determine the mode II interlaminar fracture toughness of laminates.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | //Figure 4. Impact simulation : (left) experimental setup for impact testing at [[http:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | //Figure 5. Impact simulation with finite elements (Metafor) on a quarter of a plate : maximum of the orthotropic damage variables $d_{11}$, $d_{22}$ and $d_{12}$, ranging from 0 (blue) to 1 (red).// | ||
| + | |||
| + | === References | ||
| [1] P. Ladevèze, E. Le Dantec. //Damage modelling of the elementary ply for laminated composites.// | [1] P. Ladevèze, E. Le Dantec. //Damage modelling of the elementary ply for laminated composites.// | ||
| [2] O. Allix, P. Ladevèze. // | [2] O. Allix, P. Ladevèze. // | ||
| [3] C. Hochard, P.-A. Aubourg, J.-P. Charles. //Modelling of the mechanical behaviour of woven-fabric CFRP laminates up to failure//. Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 61, pp. 221–230, 2001 \\ | [3] C. Hochard, P.-A. Aubourg, J.-P. Charles. //Modelling of the mechanical behaviour of woven-fabric CFRP laminates up to failure//. Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 61, pp. 221–230, 2001 \\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | [[team: | ||
team/gdeliege/composite.1439361032.txt.gz · Last modified: (external edit)
