Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- commit:2018:07_17 [2018/07/17 17:06] – [Test case] boemer
+++ commit:2018:07_17 [2018/07/17 19:10] (current) – boemer
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ====== Commit 2018-07-17 ======
-===== Description =====
+The general feature of this commit is described in the first section, then the corresponding test case, and finally, some minor modifications.
+===== 1. Description =====
 In this commit, the out-of-plane thickness evolution in the generalized plane strain state is coherently accounted for in the computation.  Previously, the possible increase or decrease of the out-of-plane thickness via the ''depend'' command was not taken into account in the contact area computation.  This led to an incoherently changing gap in the following scenario, where ''AIC_ONCEPERSTEP'' is activated.
@@ Line 10: / Line 13: @@
-===== Test case =====
+===== 2. Test case =====
 The test case in the following figure is identical to what was decribed previously.  A square is pushed against a contact tool (frictionless) with a pressure  $p$ , its lateral movement is blocked and its out-of-plane thickness increases (as a function of time).
-{{ :commit:2018:07_17:contactoutofplanethicknessevolutiontest.png?400 |}}
+{{ :commit:2018:07_17:contactoutofplanethicknessevolutiontest.png?300 |}}
 The gap can be computed in various ways, numerically, analytically and semi-analytically/numerically.  This is what is done in three different extractors to test the good implementation of the previous feature:
@@ Line 21: / Line 24: @@
   * ''semiNumAnalyGap'': Thirdly, the semi-analytical/numerical computation consists in dividing the nodal contact force along  $\mathbf{y}$ ,  $f_{y}$ , at  $P_{4}$  by the nodal area  $l_{x}l_{z}/n_{x}$  (where  $l_{z} = \epsilon_{z}$ , since the initial out-of-plane thickness is 1, and where  $n_{x}$  is the number of elements along  $\mathbf{x}$ ) and the normal penalty  $k_{n}$ :  $\text{gap} = f_{y}/( k_{n}l_{z}l_{x}/(2n_{x}) )$
-In all three cases, the gap should be the same.
+In all three cases, the gap should be the same (besides errors due to finite precision computation).
+===== 3. Minor modifications =====
+  * The property ''NBR_CONTACT_INTERACTION'' was replaced by ''NUM_CONTACT_INTERACTION'' to make sure  that the specific number of a contact interaction is provided and not the total number;
+  * The address of clifton was replaced by the address of blueberry in ''stats.py''.
+===== Added [a] / deleted [d] / modified [m] / renamed [r] test cases ======
+<code>
+[a] apps/gps/contThickEvol.py
+</code>
+ --- // [[dominik.boemer@uliege.be|Dominik Boemer]] 2018/07/17 19:00 //