team:gdeliege:espaint
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
team:gdeliege:espaint [2015/08/13 17:08] – geoffrey | team:gdeliege:espaint [2016/03/30 15:23] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ==== Electrostatic painting ==== | + | ===== Electrostatic painting |
=== Problem description === | === Problem description === | ||
Electrostatic painting is one of the applications I studied during my PhD. | Electrostatic painting is one of the applications I studied during my PhD. | ||
- | I started from a mathematical model by François Henrotte | + | I started from a mathematical model by François Henrotte |
and used this nice coupled problem to test different potential and mixed formulations | and used this nice coupled problem to test different potential and mixed formulations | ||
of electrostatic equations. | of electrostatic equations. | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
It must be noted that electrostatic and magnetostatic mixed formulations have the same stability problems as Stokes equations when the shape functions do not satisfy the Babuska-Brezzi inf-sup condition. | It must be noted that electrostatic and magnetostatic mixed formulations have the same stability problems as Stokes equations when the shape functions do not satisfy the Babuska-Brezzi inf-sup condition. | ||
Fortunately, | Fortunately, | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Finite element simulations === | ||
The geometrical model is a box extending from the middle of a wire to half the distance between two consecutive wires (Fig. 1). | The geometrical model is a box extending from the middle of a wire to half the distance between two consecutive wires (Fig. 1). |
team/gdeliege/espaint.1439478494.txt.gz · Last modified: 2016/03/30 15:22 (external edit)